[uf-discuss] human readable date parsing
jcraig at apple.com
Fri May 4 08:04:04 PDT 2007
Tantek Çelik wrote:
> On 5/3/07 7:10 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux at splintered.co.uk> wrote:
>> But to bring it back to the original argument, the routine extraction
>> does not necessarily have to equate to data visible in, say, a
>> The routine extraction may well be mediated via some machine
> "May" is insufficient in this case, as such machine mediated
> is a "theoretical" (or certainly not available to many people) and
> The "tooltip" is the only practical semi-visible method available
If you need to see the machine data for your own QA, you could write
You're making the same case that it "may" be forgotten and therefore
get out of date.
> If you have a deployed practical semi-visibility alternative to the
> I'm very much interested to hear it.
I implemented neither, but Operator and Tails both do this already.
More information about the microformats-discuss