[uf-discuss] HTML5, Microformats and RDFa

[André Luís]

I had misread you there, Manu. I apologize.

Thanks for clearing it up.

Those 3x bullet points are a great summary. Well done.

--
André


On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> André Luís wrote:
>> Manu,
>> the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions
>> about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all
>> of the hard work the communities have don so far.
>
> I never said the discussions "trashed" all of our hard work. I said that
> some of the discussions "ignore" (some) of the hard work performed by
> this community as well as the RDFa community.
>
>> All it does, from
>> what i gathered, is move the semantics from html and places it in a
>> separate file/place.
>
> Right - which both this community and the RDFa community are opposed to:
>
> 1. We do not want semantics to be placed in separate files.
> 2. We do not want vocabularies to be re-defined from site to site.
> 3. We want semantic markup to be easy to author for regular people - CSS
>   is /not/ easy to author.
>
> That's what I was attempting to point out with my statement. Apologies
> if I was not clear :)
>
> -- manu
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>