[uf-discuss] URL and Relative paths

Scott Reynen scott at randomchaos.com
Wed Sep 3 06:14:24 PDT 2008

On [Sep 2], at [ Sep 2] 6:45 , Martin McEvoy wrote:

> I think relative urls on the whole are "bad form"  because many  
> authors forget to set the base url for their relative paths...

There's nothing wrong with that.  See:


> 3.3. Base URL from the Retrieval URL
> If no base URL is embedded and the document is not encapsulated  
> within some other entity (e.g., the top level of a composite  
> entity), then, if a URL was used to retrieve the base document, that  
> URL shall be considered the base URL.


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list