[uf-discuss] URL and Relative paths
scott at randomchaos.com
Wed Sep 3 06:14:24 PDT 2008
On [Sep 2], at [ Sep 2] 6:45 , Martin McEvoy wrote:
> I think relative urls on the whole are "bad form" because many
> authors forget to set the base url for their relative paths...
There's nothing wrong with that. See:
> 3.3. Base URL from the Retrieval URL
> If no base URL is embedded and the document is not encapsulated
> within some other entity (e.g., the top level of a composite
> entity), then, if a URL was used to retrieve the base document, that
> URL shall be considered the base URL.
More information about the microformats-discuss