[uf-discuss] Re: An Inconvenient hCard
mirko.gustony at gmail.com
Thu May 21 06:16:39 PDT 2009
Ben Ward schrieb:
> Correct. The pattern is part-written for this exact user case (As a
> Brit, I've been loathe to the ‘cell’ / ‘mobile’ issue since I first got
> into microformats.)
I've had similar issues here for german telefax ...
> The value-class-pattern is valid for `type` in `tel`, and also in `adr`
> and `email`. FWIW, whilst we inherited these structures from vcard, I'm
> confident we will never create anything like it again. The community is
> more internationalisation aware now.
Good to here this.
> A remaining to-do task for the pattern development is to update examples
> in the specs and related documents (datetimes and enumerations alike).
I will have a look at it. So if you need a hand ...
> Feedback much appreciated on the pattern (but please see the short
> http://microformats.org/wiki/value-class-pattern#FAQ as well.)
More information about the microformats-discuss