[uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

Manu Sporny msporny at digitalbazaar.com
Wed Aug 8 08:14:34 PDT 2007

Brian Suda wrote:
> If you look at the wiki page which lists our classes,
> http://microformats.org/wiki/classes
> you will see that we have several ways of specifying a date
> hCard uses REV, which is the REVISION date
> hCalendar uses LAST-MODIFIED, the time the calendar was last changes
> hAtom uses UPDATED and PUBLISHED
> I agree it should use the ISO date-time pattern every other date
> format is using.

So, we've got 3 votes for PUBLISHED using date-time pattern, none
opposed. I'd like some others to weigh in before we resolve this. A
simple AGREE/+1 would suffice, or DISAGREE with logical argument.

-- manu

More information about the microformats-new mailing list