[uf-new] Songbird/POTI requirements for hAudio
msporny at digitalbazaar.com
Wed Aug 8 10:52:25 PDT 2007
Scott Reynen wrote:
>> If we can't deliver on that as a community - they won't have much
>> interest in implementing Microformats in Songbird.
> We *can* deliver on that, but that doesn't mean we *should*. Support by
> any specific tool should always be a lower priority than covering what
> people are commonly publishing as simply as possible. It sounds like
> Songbird has very different priorities than microformats. That's okay.
I should clarify - I think that we can deliver to meet their needs AND
stay true to the Microformats process and philosophy. Everything that
they need is backed up and supported by all of the examples we have
It's a win-win for both uF and Songbird :)
More information about the microformats-new