[uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date is redundant

Manu Sporny msporny at digitalbazaar.com
Tue Aug 14 07:00:04 PDT 2007

Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>> I agree it should use the ISO date-time pattern every other date
>>> format is using.
>> So, we've got 3 votes for PUBLISHED using date-time pattern, none
>> opposed. I'd like some others to weigh in before we resolve this. A
>> simple AGREE/+1 would suffice, or DISAGREE with logical argument.
> In either case, could folks please indicate their agreement or not on the
> wiki page for the proposal with +/-1, their name, and any additional
> commentary/explanation for the vote?
> Let's keep track of content/state on the wiki, not in email please.

A "Votes" section has been placed on the hAudio-issues page, please note
your vote if you have an opinion on any the issues. There are currently
6 issues that need to be voted on for hAudio.

-- manu

More information about the microformats-new mailing list