[uf-new] Use of img in rel-* (with analyzed data)

[Tantek Ç elik]

On 7/15/07 2:45 PM, "Manu Sporny" <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> However, I ask again - why are we giving publishers the
> choice of violating the HTML specification?

That has never been demonstrated via an actual example with URL and citation
of the clause in the spec with URL that is allegedly being violated, and
reasoning applied to the actual example as such.  It's only been asserted in
hand-waving.


> Of hiding data? 

No one is advocating that AFAIK.


> Where are
> the real world examples of why we need to provide that option?

Manu, please check the other responses on this thread, there has already
been at least one publisher that has responded and demonstrated as such.

Thanks,

Tantek