[uf-new] Third attempt at hAudio
msporny at digitalbazaar.com
Thu Jun 7 11:17:41 PDT 2007
Brian Suda wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>> should we should re-use "summary" from hReview ?
>> "summary:: This optional field serves as a title for the review itself."
>> It helps not to confuse the title of a hAudio with a contained vCard and
>> I think it has better meaning
> --- i had the same thought myself. I think we should consider this
> swap so it is also more inline with hReview and avoid confusion of FN
> in the contributor and well as the FN of the container.
Any objections to changing 'fn' to 'summary'? I definitely like
'summary' much more than 'fn'.
Ideally, we would be using 'title' - why can't we do that, again?
Because hcard uses it?
When the proposal started out, as Martin pointed out in an earlier
discussion, we started with 'work-title'.
What are the arguments against using 'title'? The only one that I can
think of is "hcard already uses it". The use of 'title' with haudio
seems to be a much more correct use of the word "title" that could be
used in hAudio, hVideo, hPublication, hMedia, etc.
More information about the microformats-new