[uf-new] Third attempt at hAudio

[Manu Sporny]

Brian Suda wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>> should we should re-use "summary" from hReview ?
>> http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview#Schema
>>
>> "summary:: This optional field serves as a title for the review itself."
>>
>> It helps not to confuse the title of a hAudio with a contained vCard and
>> I think it has better meaning
> 
> --- i had the same thought myself. I think we should consider this
> swap so it is also more inline with hReview and avoid confusion of FN
> in the contributor and well as the FN of the container.

Any objections to changing 'fn' to 'summary'? I definitely like
'summary' much more than 'fn'.

Ideally, we would be using 'title' - why can't we do that, again?
Because hcard uses it?

When the proposal started out, as Martin pointed out in an earlier
discussion, we started with 'work-title'.

What are the arguments against using 'title'? The only one that I can
think of is "hcard already uses it". The use of 'title' with haudio
seems to be a much more correct use of the word "title" that could be
used in hAudio, hVideo, hPublication, hMedia, etc.

-- manu