[uf-new] Microformat for Music Downloads

[Scott Reynen]

On Mar 20, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Ryan King wrote:

> On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
>
>> On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Ryan King wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Scott Reynen wrote:
>>>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:28 AM, Marian Steinbach wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Any comments so far? (It'll get more complicated soon enough!)
>>>>
>>>> Let's not make it any more complicated than it absolutely needs  
>>>> to be.  I'm not even convinced we need to worry about album in  
>>>> the first draft.
>>>
>>> Have you collected any examples to inform this opinion?
>>
>> Which opinion?  Starting as simple as possible is a microformats  
>> principle, so I hope you're not questioning that.  Here are the  
>> current examples of music download sites:
>
> No, that album is not common or simple. It just seems that talking  
> about what fields should be in format before there's any documented  
> examples from the wild is premature.

I wasn't trying to say anything about what fields should be in a  
format.  I meant for "I'm not even convinced" to be a statement of  
uncertainty, as opposed to "It'll get more complicated soon enough!"  
which sounded to me like the kind of assumption we shouldn't be making.

--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com