[uf-new] Microformat for Music Downloads

[Ryan King]

On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Ryan King wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
>>> On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Ryan King wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Scott Reynen wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:28 AM, Marian Steinbach wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Any comments so far? (It'll get more complicated soon enough!)
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's not make it any more complicated than it absolutely needs  
>>>>> to be.  I'm not even convinced we need to worry about album in  
>>>>> the first draft.
>>>>
>>>> Have you collected any examples to inform this opinion?
>>>
>>> Which opinion?  Starting as simple as possible is a microformats  
>>> principle, so I hope you're not questioning that.  Here are the  
>>> current examples of music download sites:
>>
>> No, that album is not common or simple. It just seems that talking  
>> about what fields should be in format before there's any  
>> documented examples from the wild is premature.
>
> I wasn't trying to say anything about what fields should be in a  
> format.  I meant for "I'm not even convinced" to be a statement of  
> uncertainty, as opposed to "It'll get more complicated soon  
> enough!" which sounded to me like the kind of assumption we  
> shouldn't be making.

Gotcha. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

-ryan
--
Ryan King
ryan at technorati.com