[uf-new] [hAudio] fn _or_ album
Martin McEvoy
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Mon Nov 5 06:38:12 PST 2007
Hello Scott
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 17:24 -0700, Scott Reynen wrote:
> No, it indicates the type of audio, not the type of name. There is
> no
> joint "fn album" property; that's two completely separate properties
> that happen to be classifying the same element. In HTML, one class
> name has no effect on the meaning of another. FN in HAUDIO *always*
> means "name of audio."
Manu and Brian had quite a debate on fn audio (nine days) which started
off in the Item/track debate
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2007-October/001151.html
That ended up as the Proposal being
...
HAUDIO parts are denoted by ITEM:
<span class="item"><span class="fn">Track Name</span></span>
EXAMPLES:
Album with two tracks, simple example:
<span class="haudio">
<span class="fn album">Best Before 1984</span>
<span class="contributor">Crass</span>
<div class="item">
<span class="fn">Hokkaido Dream</span>
</div>
<div class="item">
<span class="fn">Tokyo Groove</span>
</div>
</span>
Album with two tracks, more detailed:
<span class="haudio">
<span class="fn album">Best Before 1984</span>
<span class="contributor">Crass</span>
<span class="item">
<span class="fn">Hokkaido Dream</span>
<abbr class="duration" title="PT3M24S">3:24</abbr>
</span>
<span class="item">
<span class="fn">Tokyo Groove</span>
<abbr class="duration" title="PT4M46S">4:46</abbr>
</span>
</span>
...
<span class="fn album">Best Before 1984</span> is not both a track and Album, Its just an album
The context in which "fn album" is used in the above example is pretty
much a re-use from "fn org" where "fn album" is used to imply that fn
type is an album.
This is my Axe that I am grinding if:
<span class="fn album">Best Before 1984</span> Is an album
and
<span class="album">Best Before 1984</span> is also an Album
where are the advantages of using <span class="fn album">Best Before
1984</span> over just <span class="album">Best Before 1984</span> ?
It seems correct and understandable to simply markup hAudio like this:
A track unknown album, detailed:
<span class="haudio">
<span class="item">
<span class="fn">Hokkaido Dream</span>
<abbr class="duration" title="PT3M24S">3:24</abbr>
</span>
</span>
a single track known Album, detailed:
<span class="haudio">
<span class="item">
<span class="album">Best Before 1984</span>
<span class="fn">Hokkaido Dream</span>
<abbr class="duration" title="PT3M24S">3:24</abbr>
</span>
</span>
Album with two tracks, detailed:
<span class="haudio">
<span class="album">Best Before 1984</span>
<span class="contributor">Crass</span>
<span class="item">
<span class="fn">Hokkaido Dream</span>
<abbr class="duration" title="PT3M24S">3:24</abbr>
</span>
<span class="item">
<span class="fn">Tokyo Groove</span>
<abbr class="duration" title="PT4M46S">4:46</abbr>
</span>
</span>
No misunderstandings, and easy to understand. I don't understand what
benefits a publisher has using "fn album" over simply just "album"
Microformats are supposed to use "simple conventions" and "use brief,
descriptive class names", sorry about the quotes I am just emphasising
my Issue.
Thanks
Martin
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list