[uf-new] hAudio position and description properties

[Martin McEvoy]

On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 20:30 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 21:08 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> > > Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service
> > > and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The
> > > raw analysis data is available here:
> > > 
> > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files
> > > 
> > > The analysis is available here:
> > > 
> > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Services
> > > 
> > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Podcasts
> > > 
> > > The new analysis shows very strong support for POSITION. This property
> > > is displayed in 70.73% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of
> > > the 8 podcast websites analyzed.
> > 
> > I found No evidence of Position as far as podcasting is concerned
> > although all the examples make a reference to episode I am not sure that
> > this is the same thing, Can I also point out that podcasting Is NOT a
> > problem area for this discussion.
> > 
> > However Position Is something that should be supported As far as Music
> > Downloads are concerned
> > 
> > +1 for Position
> > 
> > > 
> > > There is also enough support to meet the 80/20 rule for DESCRIPTION.
> > > This property is displayed in 39.02% of 41 music service websites
> > > analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed.
> > 
> > +1 for Description
> > 
> > > 
> > > PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since
> > >           there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into
> > >           the Microformat.
> > > 
> > > -- manu
> > 
> > Manu are you also going to REMOVE the Album and Podcast properties and
> > revert back to *audio-title* until any disputes have been resolved? I do
> > not think that three votes was enough to warrant any changes to the
> > existing proposal.
> > 
> > I think you should have notified all the active participants in hAudio
> > BEFORE you made any changes to OUR proposition.
> 
> Sorry for seeming unreasonable but the additions of Album and Recording
> really was a bit of a surprise to me and something that wasn't fully
> discussed
> 
> Anyway An easy solution  The beginning of this conversation was about
> (in a nutshell) merging certain properties from  hAlbum into hAudio
> right! so why don't we just do that 
> 
> >From hAlbum we reuse both 
> 
> *album-title*
> http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Album_Title
> 
> and 
> 
> *track*
> http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Track 
> 
> coupled with new properties
> 
> *position*  and *description*
> 
> merge all that with the 0.6 version of hAudio and I think we have
> something that will suit everyone's situation
> 
> The full property list would be
> 
> hAudio
> album-title
description
> contributor
> published
> rel-sample
> rel-enclosure
> rel-payment
> photo
> track
position
> audio-title
> duration
> category
> price
> 
> Comments?
> 
> 
> Thanks 
> Martin

Sorry, Its been a long weekend :)

> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Martin
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > microformats-new mailing list
> > > microformats-new at microformats.org
> > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new