[uf-new] item property (was: hAudio: audio-title/album-title vs. recording/album)

[Michael Smethurst]

On 14/10/07 23:47, "Andy Mabbett" <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:

> In message <1192400662.14668.3.camel at localhost.localdomain>, Martin
> McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> writes
> 
>> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 22:44 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>>> good point!  however, people also refer to items as "songs,"
>>> 
>>> Some tracks are songs, others are not. All songs, though, are tracks.
>> 
>> You may find that all songs are NOT Tracks...
>> 
>> a busker may sing a song for you on a street corner YOU may sing a song
>> to yourself in the shower.
> 
> Indeed; read my comment as "all recorded songs". Or are you planning to
> mark up your local busker?

Well I wouldn't want to mark up my local busker but marking up live
performances would be kinda handy. In my case I need to mark up
performance/set lists for Glastonbury, the Proms etc

In these cases track would be plain wrong

Also nested items/haudios would allow you to mark up classical works/opera
(as opposed to perfomances/recordings). In the case of an opera:

Haudio - opera
    haudio - act
        haudio - scene
            haudio - aria

Or is this too much of a corner case?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.