[uf-new] hAudio proposal: ITEM/TRACK

[Manu Sporny]

Scott Reynen wrote:
>> Not wanting to add to the confusion but would it not be possible to have
>> infinitely nested haudios with neither item or track and use mfo when the
>> markup enforces containment that you don't want to be reflected in the
>> model?
> 
> As much as I'd like to move forward a general MFO technique, that isn't
> necessary here as the hAudio proposal specifically makes all contained
> hAudio (currently called "track") opaque [1].  The current proposal
> appears to only support two levels of nesting, but that may change. 
> Examples of several levels of audio published on the web today would
> help support such a change.

We could also make the argument that there is no reason to restrict
hAudio to two levels of nesting. There are no ill side-effects by not
restricting it.

-- manu