[uf-new] hAudio proposal: ITEM/TRACK

Michael Smethurst Michael.Smethurst at bbc.co.uk
Mon Oct 15 09:09:03 PDT 2007

On 15/10/07 15:51, "Scott Reynen" <scott at makedatamakesense.com> wrote:

> On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
>> Not wanting to add to the confusion but would it not be possible to
>> have
>> infinitely nested haudios with neither item or track and use mfo
>> when the
>> markup enforces containment that you don't want to be reflected in the
>> model?
> As much as I'd like to move forward a general MFO technique, that
> isn't necessary here as the hAudio proposal specifically makes all
> contained hAudio (currently called "track") opaque [1].  The current
> proposal appears to only support two levels of nesting, but that may
> change.  Examples of several levels of audio published on the web
> today would help support such a change.

Multiple levels would also allow you to mark up multi-disc box sets:

Haudio - hex enduction hour

    haudio - disc 1

        haudio - The Classical

Sorry for lack of examples - I'm short on time today

> [1] http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Track
> --
> Scott Reynen
> MakeDataMakeSense.com
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

More information about the microformats-new mailing list