[uf-new] Re: Microformalyze (Apology made an ass of myself)
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Sun Oct 21 07:08:38 PDT 2007
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 13:29 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Martin McEvoy wrote:
> >> Baba : 100.00%
> >> Flumps : 50.00%
> >> I KNOW these two properties do not exist in any way at WebOrganics
> >> Can you see now WHY I am concerned and moderately confused
> >> Microformalize does not seem to be calculating the existence of these
> >> properties on a page it seems to be Just calculating if I have ticked a
> >> box or not.
> >> Am I missing something?
> > You know I am Impossibly Dense sometimes, Lets call it being
> > overworked :)
> > Sorry Manu Looking at the above now It seems I was making an ass of
> > myself again
> > Wish I was better at apologising
> No problem, Martin - no need to feel that bad about it. I could have
> been much more helpful in the first reply I sent to the list regarding
> the examples and Microformalyze, so my apologies for that. :)
You can be a little cryptic sometimes but only as much as I am vague :)
Something I will have to work on ;)
> Your intentions were good and that goes a long way. Plus, there has
> never been a public vetting on Microformalyze, so that was very useful
> as well. In addition, we can say that the hAudio examples have been
> rigorously defended - which only strengthens the hAudio Microformat.
If you ever need something to show what Microformalize does NOT do you
can always point them at this discussion,
> All in all, while painful, these discussions help us understand what
> we're doing in the Microformats community and how we go about doing it.
> That being said, I'm going to be mailing an updated proposal to the
> hAudio TRACK/ITEM debate that I think will work for everyone involved
> and will hopefully resolve the last major remaining issues for hAudio!
> -- manu
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-new