[uf-new] hAudio ITEM debate proposal #3
scott at makedatamakesense.com
Sun Oct 28 19:49:35 PST 2007
On Oct 28, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Scott, I think you and I had the most adverse reactions to this
> approach. I've learned to live with it as this approach did not cause
> problems when marking up over 20 of the audio-info examples.
> Thoughts, suggestions, comments?
As long as an ITEM within an HAUDIO is itself defined as an audio
recording, I see no problem with leaving out the HAUDIO class name here.
More information about the microformats-new