[uf-new] hAudio ITEM debate proposal #3

[Scott Reynen]

On Oct 28, 2007, at 8:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:

> Scott, I think you and I had the most adverse reactions to this
> approach. I've learned to live with it as this approach did not cause
> problems when marking up over 20 of the audio-info examples.
>
> Thoughts, suggestions, comments?


As long as an ITEM within an HAUDIO is itself defined as an audio  
recording, I see no problem with leaving out the HAUDIO class name here.

--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com