[uf-new] hAudio ITEM debate proposal #3

[Michael Smethurst]

On 29/10/07 12:46, "Manu Sporny" <msporny at digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> Julian Stahnke wrote:
>> I like it!
>> 
>> So, to clarify, would a single track be marked up like this?
>> 
>> <span class="haudio">
>>    <span class="fn">Two Sleepy People</span>
>>    <span class="contributor">Silje Nergaard</span>
>> </span>
>> 
>> And a track from the album ŒAt First Light¹:
>> 
>> <span class="haudio">
>>    <span class="fn">Two Sleepy People</span>
>>    <span class="contributor">Silje Nergaard</span>
>>    <span class="album">At First Light</span>
>> </span>
> 
> Yes, that would be the proper markup based on the current proposal.

Again not wanting to muddy any waters but it seems like we're trying to
capture 2 forms of containment here:

- using nesting + item to indicate containment of

- using album to indicate containment by

Is there any mileage in pushing for class="hasPart" and class="isPartOf"?

It would bring things into line with dublin core but my be a little triple-y
for these parts


> 
> -- manu
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.