[uf-new] hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant
Martin McEvoy
martin at weborganics.co.uk
Sat Sep 8 17:30:54 PDT 2007
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 16:20 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> Most of hAlbum's properties overlap with hAudio. In fact, the only two
> properties that do not overlap with hAudio are 'album-title' and 'track'.
>
Does hAudio then describe a collection of hAudio's ?
> It has been proposed that we merge these two properties into hAudio to
> provide a cleaner, more unified way of describing audio songs and
> albums. Examples of how this would work along with the rest of the
> arguments are located on the wiki:
Great proposal Manu this will save a lot of confusion over hAlbum and
hAudio, and save bloating the wiki with proposals that probably wont be
used such as hAlbum.
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Problem:_hAlbum_is_redundant
>
> This approach has a number of benefits:
>
> - We'd be able to get rid of hAlbum (which I proposed, but never really
> liked all that much). One less Microformat is good. Minimalism is
> good.
+1 for that
> - It provides an elegant way to extend hAudio to albums, podcasts,
> toplists and other audio collections.
+ for that too
should we also add a type class
<span class="type">Album</span>
<span class="type">Podcast</span>
<span class="type">Compilation</span>
etc...
> - It would address an issue that the Songbird folks had with hAudio
> (not being to specify album-title in an hAudio).
We need to also address and discuss descriptions for this to become
complete.
> - Parser implementation is simpler - less code to write to parse both
> hAudio AND hAlbum.
which is always a plus +
> - It would effectively close the debate on using 'fn' or 'audio-title'.
> Resolving two issues with one proposal.
>
> We'll be implementing this in the next several weeks on our website to
> see how it works. If the implementation goes smoothly, I'd like to adopt
> this method as the standard way of doing albums in hAudio.
>
> Thoughts and comments from everybody on this approach would be great at
> this point. If you wanted to vote for/against it, the link is here:
>
> http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#Votes_7
>
> -- manu
Thank you
Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list