[uf-new] Re: Namespace anti-pattern and hAudio TITLE (was:
hAudio FN or Title)
Andy Mabbett
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Mon Feb 4 12:25:55 PST 2008
In message <47A616A6.6090903 at digitalbazaar.com>, Manu Sporny
<msporny at digitalbazaar.com> writes
>We should be using TITLE for the title of audio recordings.
>So, who is going to make an argument against using TITLE in hAudio?
I'm not, but I do think we should allow for distinction between the
titles of tracks, albums, works and similar.
This could take the form of:
album-title
track-title
etc.
or it could be:
<foo class="album">
<fooclass="title">
Meddle
</foo>
</foo>
<foo class="track">
<fooclass="title">
One of These Days
</foo>
</foo>
The former, hyphenated, pattern could again borrow the DC "qualified"
model, and be treated by parsers as equivalent to "title" for some
purposes", but distinguished from each other, for other purposes.
--
Andy Mabbett
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list