[uf-new] Re: Namespace anti-pattern and hAudio TITLE

[Walter Logeman]

In the Proposal put forward by Manu [1] would the distinction you 
propose Andy be allowed? possible? encouraged? needed?

Walter

-

Andy Mabbett wrote:

>> So, who is going to make an argument against using TITLE in hAudio?
> 
> I'm not, but I do think we should allow for distinction between the
> titles of tracks, albums, works and similar.
> 
> This could take the form of:
> 
>         album-title
>         track-title
>         etc.
> 
> or it could be:
> 
>         <foo class="album">
>             <fooclass="title">
>                 Meddle
>             </foo>
>         </foo>
> 
>         <foo class="track">
>             <fooclass="title">
>                 One of These Days
>             </foo>
>         </foo>
> 
> The former, hyphenated, pattern could again borrow the DC "qualified"
> model, and be treated by parsers as equivalent to "title" for some
> purposes", but distinguished from each other, for other purposes.


 
[1]http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-February/001468.html