[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Martin McEvoy]

Martin McEvoy wrote:
> Hello David...
>
> David Janes wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Martin McEvoy
>> <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>>  
>>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>>    
>>>> I would also like to propose that an hEntry that is a comment 
>>>> should be
>>>> marked up like this.....
>>>>
>>>> <div class="comment hentry">
>>>> ...
>>>> </div>
>>>>       
>>> sorry I meant...
>>>
>>> <div class="hentry comment">
>>> ...
>>> </div>
>>>
>>>     
>> I think those would be equivalent (?). However, another way to do it 
>> would
>> be to add "comments" to a wrapping hfeed
>>
>> <div class="hfeed comments">
>>  <div class="hentry">a comment</div>
>> </div>
>>   
> Im Sorry David I totally disagree with the above approach because It 
> detaches the comments from the original content, The Content and the 
> Comment should be presented inside the same feed element.
>> This is interestingly documented right here:
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/90594399@N00/2271787498/
>>   
> Great stuff David, I dont like the in-reply-to extension because for 
> it to presented correctly in hAtom terms you would have to "emulate" 
> another namespace, ie the entry- bit.
>
> Anyway If you are proposing adding stuff to hatom like 
> in-reply-to(replies) etc... why not use an official atom term like 
> "related"[1]
>
> <a rel="related" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
>
> [1] http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/index.php#link

Even better use an existing link type "section"[1] to indicate that the 
href attribute of a link is a section of the current page.

<a rel="section" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#h-6.12
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>


-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/