[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Martin McEvoy]

Hello David...

David Janes wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Martin McEvoy
> <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>     
>>> I would also like to propose that an hEntry that is a comment should be
>>> marked up like this.....
>>>
>>> <div class="comment hentry">
>>> ...
>>> </div>
>>>       
>> sorry I meant...
>>
>> <div class="hentry comment">
>> ...
>> </div>
>>
>>     
> I think those would be equivalent (?). However, another way to do it would
> be to add "comments" to a wrapping hfeed
>
> <div class="hfeed comments">
>  <div class="hentry">a comment</div>
> </div>
>   
Im Sorry David I totally disagree with the above approach because It 
detaches the comments from the original content, The Content and the 
Comment should be presented inside the same feed element.
> This is interestingly documented right here:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/90594399@N00/2271787498/
>   
Great stuff David, I dont like the in-reply-to extension because for it 
to presented correctly in hAtom terms you would have to "emulate" 
another namespace, ie the entry- bit.

Anyway If you are proposing adding stuff to hatom like 
in-reply-to(replies) etc... why not use an official atom term like 
"related"[1]

<a rel="related" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>

[1] http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/index.php#link


Thanks.


-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/