[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[David Janes]

Just so I get this straight, what's the official Wiki pages we're
using  to capture all of this?

Regards, etc...

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>
>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not rel=bookmark?
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12
>>>
>>> | Refers to a bookmark. A bookmark is a link to a key entry point within
>>> | an extended document. The title attribute may be used, for example, to
>>> | label the bookmark. Note that several bookmarks may be defined in each
>>> | document.
>>>
>>> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-design-pattern#rel.3D.22bookmark.22
>>>
>>> | By convention, this entry point also captures the notion of a
>>> "permalink".
>>>
>> Agreed, I also feel that in order for a parser to extract comments only
>> from a page a different link type is needed for a comment, it will help
>> distinguish a comment from the article.
>>
>> Having said that I am thinking re-use XFN rel-contact for this link type,
>> and use rel-bookmark for backwards compatibility with existing parsers eg:
>>
>> <a rel="contact bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
>>
>> |contact could be parsed as the in-reply-to Atom Threading Extension
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4685).
>
> Please see http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> Martin McEvoy
>
> http://weborganics.co.uk/
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-new mailing list
> microformats-new at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
>



-- 
David Janes
Mercenary Programmer
http://code.davidjanes.com