[uf-new] Re: Comment Questions

[Martin McEvoy]

David Janes wrote:
> Just so I get this straight, what's the official Wiki pages we're
> using  to capture all of this?
>   

http://microformats.org/wiki/comment

 ;-) 


> Regards, etc...
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> Martin McEvoy wrote:
>>     
>>> Toby A Inkster wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Why not rel=bookmark?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12
>>>>
>>>> | Refers to a bookmark. A bookmark is a link to a key entry point within
>>>> | an extended document. The title attribute may be used, for example, to
>>>> | label the bookmark. Note that several bookmarks may be defined in each
>>>> | document.
>>>>
>>>> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-design-pattern#rel.3D.22bookmark.22
>>>>
>>>> | By convention, this entry point also captures the notion of a
>>>> "permalink".
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Agreed, I also feel that in order for a parser to extract comments only
>>> from a page a different link type is needed for a comment, it will help
>>> distinguish a comment from the article.
>>>
>>> Having said that I am thinking re-use XFN rel-contact for this link type,
>>> and use rel-bookmark for backwards compatibility with existing parsers eg:
>>>
>>> <a rel="contact bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
>>>
>>> |contact could be parsed as the in-reply-to Atom Threading Extension
>>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4685).
>>>       
>> Please see http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin McEvoy
>>
>> http://weborganics.co.uk/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> microformats-new mailing list
>> microformats-new at microformats.org
>> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   


-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/