[uf-new] Comments proposals

[Martin McEvoy]

David Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> Hello David
>>
>> David Janes wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Toby A Inkster <mail at tobyinkster.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> David Janes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at
>>>>> weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  *  reply[1] (comment-link) 60%
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>  o By adding "rel-reply" the author is indicating that the page
>>>>>> http://someblog/post#comment-001 is a reply for the referring page (see
>>>>>> example).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>> Martin, you've explained this a few times on the list, and I have to
>>>> admit,
>>>> this is the first time I've "got it". Yes, this does make sense as a
>>>> solution. rel="reply bookmark" would be even better.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I withdraw my comment about semantic nonsense and apologize to Martin
>>> for my tone. I thought this was the in-reply-to proposal.
>>>
>>>       
>> No worries David we all say things we shouldn't discourse in any discussion
>> like this usually ends in progress in my view ;-)
>>
>>     
>>> However, how is the different than saying a comment is marked up as
>>> "hentry comment", which will work on close to 100% [1] of the
>>> exemplars instead of 60%?
>>>
>>>       
>> I have always liked "hentry comment" I made a fleeting attempt to propose it
>> in an earlier message,
>>
>> http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-November/001889.html
>>
>> I still think this is the best way to go, but it got lost in the following
>> discussion ;-)
>>
>>     
>>> Regards, etc...
>>>
>>> [1] there are universal issues for all proposals with blogger DL lists
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Best wishes
>>
>>     
>
> I think every issue relating to every proposal has been thrashed
> through here. Can I make a consolidation list on the Wiki of each
> individual proposal (e.g. add "comment" to the "hentry") and we can
> add our plus/minus points?
>
> Regards, etc...
>
>   
Yes David Go ahead It will help A LOT

Thanks.

-- 
Martin McEvoy

http://weborganics.co.uk/