[uf-new] hAudio issue D2 "title"
Sarven Capadisli
csarven at gmail.com
Thu Sep 4 07:48:28 PDT 2008
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
> Resoulution 2:
>
> Use "HTITLE"
>
> [...]
> "hTitle can then be reused in any microformat that needs a "title"
> property. hTitle has been given a root class name as it is intended to
> be used in conjunction with any other root class microformat and mirrors
> the association semantics expressed by hfeed => hentry in hAtom"
> [...]
>
> A Proposal was made in an email on Aug 13th 2008 by Myself.
> http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-August/001692.html
If we don't want to undo the definition of TITLE across all
microformats, then we should respect the same reasoning for FN.
"Stretching" or "undoing" names aside, I find "title" to be more
accurate and will probably be grasped easier then "fn". Yet, the
definition of TITLE is more stretched then FN. Not an easy call.
Hence, I believe this will leave us with htitle or something-else
because it has potential to solve certain problems and stretch some of
the limitations that we are facing. Manu made a fair summary here:
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-September/001759.html
Choice:
1) +1 for htitle
2) +1 for title
3) +1 for fn
Sarven Capadisli
http://www.csarven.ca
More information about the microformats-new
mailing list