|
|
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
Line 44: |
Line 44: |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| Please add new issues to the bottom of the [[news-brainstorming#Open_Issues|Open Issues]] section by copy and pasting the [[news-brainstorming#Issues_Template|Template]]. Please follow-up to resolved/rejected issues with new information rather than resubmitting such issues. Duplicate issue additions will be reverted. | | Please see [[hnews-issues|hNews issues]]. |
|
| |
|
| See also [[hatom-issues|hAtom Issues]] for questions about [[hAtom]]. | | See also [[hatom-issues|hAtom Issues]] for questions about [[hAtom]]. |
|
| |
|
| === Issues Template ===
| |
|
| |
| {{issues-format}}
| |
|
| |
| === Open Issues ===
| |
| <div class="hentry">
| |
| {{OpenIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"><span class="published">2009-10-09</span> raised by <span class="fn">Miles De Feyter</span></span>
| |
| <div class="entry-content discussion issues">
| |
| * <strong class="entry-title">Implementation of item-license as it relates to hNews</strong>. Reading through the item-license brainstorm it seems to indicate that "item-license" would need to be nested within something with the class of "item". So as this relates to hNews is the suggestion to then have an articles containing div have the three class names of "hnews hentry item"?
| |
| </div>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
| === Closed Issues ===
| |
|
| |
| <div class="hentry">
| |
| {{ClosedIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"><span class="published">2009-09-28</span> raised by <span class="fn">[[User:MilesD|Miles De Feyter]]</span></span>
| |
| <div class="entry-content discussion issues">
| |
| * <strong class="entry-title">Principles as a requirement</strong>. Working for a publishing company that owns and operates a large number of different organizations I'd love to incorporate hNews within our publishing system. The hNews requirement for a principles statement could pose a problem though or at least make rolling out hNews a more involved process then it would be otherwise. The issue is, I would now have to go to each product owner and ask then to provide this principles statement to link to. So my concern is now rather then just making a change to the publishing system to support hNews there is this requirement for some supporting content. And due to the nature of the content I can only assume our legal dep. would need to sign off as well, further complicating the adoption of hNews.
| |
| ** +1 I agree that the "principles" property (and probably all other others) should be optional. [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 18:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *** I think it's important to explain why principles is a requirement. hnews is essentially a specialization of hAtom. Its purpose is to distinguish news on the web. Hence the description of source organisation, license and principles. Of these, principles is the only one which consistently distinguishes news on the web from other content (eg. commercial, government). In the future it should be distinguished further by making the principles themselves machine readable (but that is for a later date). Most professional news organisations adhere to a Statement of Principles (e.g. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards and http://www.journalism.org/resources/ethics_codes). If a site wants to mark up its content but does not want to distinguish it as news, then wouldn't it be easiest to use hAtom? [[User:martinjemoore|Martin Moore]] 9:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *** Having discussed this issue at length outside this brainstorming, we understand some of the concerns of the microformat community regarding 'must', but are still convinced of the criticality of principles to hNews - therefore recommend downgrading from 'must' to 'should'. [[User:martinjemoore|Martin Moore]] 14:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| </div>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| <div class="hentry">
| |
| {{ClosedIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"><span class="published">18:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)</span> raised by <span class="fn">[[User:Kevin Marks|Kevin Marks]]</span></span>
| |
| <div class="entry-content discussion issues">
| |
| * <strong class="entry-title">hCalendar instead of dateline?</strong> Would an [[hCalendar]] event (which can contain an hCard location) make sense for a dateline, or is the 'date' part more often omitted?
| |
| ** Confusingly, the journalistic term "dateline" isn't anything to do with a date or time. It is the location from which a report is filed and is generally the main location associated with a story. Generally, a dateline consists of a city (e.g. "Rome") but could be the name of a ship at sea or even a space station. [[User:Stuart Myles|Stuart Myles]] 21:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
| |
| </div>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
| <div class="hentry">
| |
| {{ClosedIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"><span class="published">18:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)</span> raised by <span class="fn">[[User:Kevin Marks|Kevin Marks]]</span></span>
| |
| <div class="entry-content discussion issues">
| |
| * <strong class="entry-title">hCard instead of geo?</strong> Is geo really in use here, or would using an hCard (that can contain geo) be a better way of representing locations referred to in the story, as more human readable?
| |
| ** The reason for geo being highlighted (as an optional field) is to promote at least one location identifier in the story--preferably the most appropriate single location on a map for that particular story. Geo does not have to be related to dateline, but in some [http://labs.ap.org/wiki/hNews examples] we've worked on, we show the two collapsed into a single field. --[[User:JonathanMalek|JonathanMalek]] 23:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ** For locations referred to in the story, I agree--publishers should be using [[hCard]] with the contained geo to markup the locations themselves. One of the concepts I've struggled with is drawing an admittedly arbitrary line between the metadata ''about'' a story from the metadata ''within'' a story. For the former, we've focused on simplicity and minimalism, primarily as a means to encourage adoption. That has meant preferring [[rel-tag]] over in-line entity extraction and markup using compound microformats. For the latter, we feel that the field is open: use whatever microformat fits your purpose, however you can--the more, the better. This lets publishers with minimal technology capabilities at least get started by tweaking a few templates in their CMS, while those more technically inclined aren't limited by the simplicity of the format to a paucity of data. --[[User:JonathanMalek|JonathanMalek]] 23:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ** Also, dateline can be text or [[hCard]], as noted in the [[news-brainstorming#Common_News_Fields|Common News Fields]] section. --[[User:JonathanMalek|JonathanMalek]] 18:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| </div>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
| <div class="hentry">
| |
| {{ClosedIssue}} <span class="entry-summary author vcard"><span class="published">18:32, 24 August 2009 (UTC)</span> raised by <span class="fn">[[User:Kevin Marks|Kevin Marks]]</span></span>
| |
| <div class="entry-content discussion issues">
| |
| * <strong class="entry-title">What is item-license?</strong> Using [[rel-license]] presumably?
| |
| ** We're working off the [[licensing-brainstorming#item_as_container|licensing-brainstorming]] discussions for this. Our concern with [[rel-license]] was its definition as applying to an entire page, rather than an item within a page. The current discussions around licensing definitely address that. --[[User:JonathanMalek|JonathanMalek]] 00:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *** +1 using item-license for news-brainstorming makes sense. [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] 22:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
| |
| </div>
| |
| </div>
| |
|
| |
|
| == Naming == | | == Naming == |