assistive-technology-abbr-results

Revision as of 11:47, 16 August 2007 by Adactio (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)

Jump to: navigation, search

assistive technology abbr results

This page is for document the precise results of using assistive-technology with real world examples in the wild of the abbr design pattern, as nearly always used by hCalendar (e.g. dtstart, dtend), often by hReview (e.g. dtreviewed, rating) and sometimes by hCard (e.g. bday, type subproperty) and by Geo.

Contents


Each assistive-technology listed here should link to a precise description of the tool/service on the assistive-technology page, including version number, when published, etc. Each test result listed for each assistive technology should link to the example that was tested.

Test Cases

The WaSP Accessibility Task Force is working on a set of extended test cases (work-in-progress]) that will cover the following data formats and markup formats. Please add to the list so we can create a comprehensive result set.

Data Formats

Please provide hyperlinks to examples in the wild for each case that is to be tested. Test cases with example in the wild URLs merit more testing than those without. However, the purpose of these test cases is to find the best solution, whether or not it is currently being used.

Rejected Data formats

Dates without punctuation as they have proved unusable. Proof is premise for [hAccessibility] article on the Web Standards Project Buzz blog. Window Eyes and JAWS read un-punctuated dates as single number. [JAWS 8 on IE7 citation (MP3 Audio)] of "twenty million seventy-thousand three-hundred twelve" is reason enough for rejection.

Markup Possibilities

Valid HTML4

Invalid HTML4

Markup possibilities that are invalid in HTML4/XHTML1 are noted here to be clear that they were considered and rejected. Since microformats build on posh, any technique that is invalid semantic (X)HTML is unacceptable for a microformats solution. There is no need to bother testing these.

Markup Rejections

Screenreader Language Pronunciations

Verbosity settings

Screenreaders

Results

To be determined.

See Also

assistive-technology-abbr-results was last modified: Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Views