Difference between revisions of "h-review-feedback"

From Microformats Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added summary, consistency issue)
 
(→‎Consistency with other microformats: added e-description => e-content proposal, signed)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* p-reviewer => p-author
 
* p-reviewer => p-author
 
* dt-reviewed => dt-published
 
* dt-reviewed => dt-published
 +
* e-description => e-content
  
What is the value of duplicating these properties? Could they be merged, increasing consistency between microformats and reducing total amount of surface area which must be remembered? As there are almost no microformats2 h-reviews in the wild, right now would be a good time to make these changes.
+
What is the value of duplicating these properties? Could they be merged, increasing consistency between microformats and reducing total amount of surface area which must be remembered? As there are almost no microformats2 h-reviews in the wild, right now would be a good time to make these changes --[[User:Barnabywalters|bw]] 15:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:22, 13 March 2014

Feedback and discussion of h-review. Summarise any useful conclusions from discussions in #microformats on freenode here.

Consistency with other microformats

Some h-review properties are extremely similar to more generic, reusable properties in other microformats such as h-entry, h-recipe:

  • p-reviewer => p-author
  • dt-reviewed => dt-published
  • e-description => e-content

What is the value of duplicating these properties? Could they be merged, increasing consistency between microformats and reducing total amount of surface area which must be remembered? As there are almost no microformats2 h-reviews in the wild, right now would be a good time to make these changes --bw 15:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC)