[microformats-discuss] Result set: thoughts and ideas?
dimitri.glazkov at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 18:15:22 PDT 2005
On 10/6/05, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar <drernie at opendarwin.org> wrote:
> Hi Dimitri,
> Thanks for diving in on this! This sounds related to the new table
> discussion I'm starting:
Yes, I think it is related, but can't seem to wrap my head about
exactly how it fits there.
> I think you may want to split up your idea into two parts:
> - a table of results
> - the list of result pages
> That latter might also be used for a "1 of 3" notice, a la S5. The
> former, interestingly, implies a connection between XOXO-lists and
> tables, as both have the meaningful concept of "20-40 of 100".
Well, I thought about this, and realized that the "paged" grouping of
a result set is usually (most likely) an artificial split, driven not
by data semantics, but rather UI decisions. So, I decided against
buliding paging in -- as Rico's LiveGrid shows us, "there is no
So a list of result pages may or may not exist -- that decision is up
to the UA or the script that represents it.
Does this make any sense?
More information about the microformats-discuss