[microformats-discuss] Re: playlist microformat

Chris Messina chris.messina at gmail.com
Fri Sep 9 16:50:37 PDT 2005


Definitely -- as well as these pages, output from Drupal:

http://www.musicforamerica.org/music
http://www.partyben.com/downloads/sixxmixx.html

Chris

P.S. PartyBen rules!

On 9/9/05, Lucas Gonze <lucas.gonze at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's a good application for it/ thing to use as an example of
> current practics, agreed.
> 
> Also, Audioscrobbler pages might be perfect.
> 
> - Lucas
> 
> On 9/9/05, Chris Messina <chris.messina at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Seems to me one application that we should not only consider applying
> > our work to, but possibly also reverse engineering for a functional
> > use of the microformat is iTunes2Web
> > (http://www.aarone.org/iTunes2Web/).
> >
> > Imagine taking your iTunes library, exported as XML, and then
> > converting it to semantic XHTML. Then give it a UI like this by
> > applying some crazy JavaScript or XSLT:
> >
> > http://www.aarone.org/iTunes2Web/example/
> >
> > There's no reason why our MF wouldn't allow us to do this.... right?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On 9/9/05, Lucas Gonze <lucas.gonze at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/9/05, Chris Messina <chris.messina at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I wanted to chime in briefly at the meta level (ayuck) to try to help
> > > > the hPlaylist discussion evolve productively, in a way that's most
> > > > supportive of the microformat mission.
> > >
> > > Thanks!  But also, don't forget the playlist mission.
> > >
> > > > * My second point is that microformats are supposed to be used like
> > > > building blocks (that's what the logo was designed to look like, FYI).
> > > > So in this case, there seems to be little value in reinventing XOXO
> > > > just to make a flat outline for media.
> > >
> > > I can't really picture what a XOXO implementation would look like.
> > > Any chance you could provide sample markup of XSPF semantics using a
> > > XOXO wrapper?
> > >
> > > > * On top of that, we're really discussing two separate tasks here. The
> > > > first is marking up a series of items in a specific order -- i.e., a
> > > > "playlist." The second aspect is marking up media items like movies,
> > > > mp3s, images and so on. These are typically binary objects that need
> > > > to be described externally and linked to remotely. Those items need
> > > > not be found in playlists to be useful, so really we're describing two
> > > > separate microformats.
> > >
> > > That's an interesting and worthwhile point.  I can picture a separate
> > > hTrack concept, with the caveat that I have to see the details to be
> > > confident that it will work.
> > >
> > > > * And, as David has pointed out, the playlist spec should be
> > > > universally useful and not simply apply to mp3esque media files.
> > > > Although the work so far suggests that hPlaylist apply specifically to
> > > > mp3-style lists where ID3 + m3u might have sufficed before, we're
> > > > seeing combination playlists now that represent songs, music videos
> > > > and digital booklets
> > > > (http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/41771361/). The hPlaylist
> > > > work should accommodate this -- as well as, for example, the work
> > > > being done on H20 playlists (h2obeta.law.harvard.edu).
> > >
> > > I differ on this.  If it's not timed media, it's a distraction that we
> > > can't afford.
> > >
> > > - Lucas
> > >
> > > (I'll be away from my office for the next couple weeks, so will be
> > > extra slow to respond).
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list