[uf-discuss] rel="license" and copyright

[kota the vantguarde]

Hello,

On 11/18/06, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>
> I'm starting to look at using rel="license". Am I right in thing that it
> can be used to indicate that a page is NOT available under a license, as
> well as for those that are? For instance:
>
>        This page is <a rel="license"
>        href="http://www.example.com/copyright>copyright Example Ltd.
>        2006</a> and may not be reproduced.

If it's not published under a certain licence but copyrighted (like in
this case), you should use rel="copyright" instead of rel-licence.

The value "copyright" is a predefined linktype in HTML,
(http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-links)
and says that "Refers to a copyright statement for the current document."
So I think using rel-copyright would perfectly fit in.

-- 
vant m. yak / vantguarde at gmail.com