[uf-discuss] rel="license" and copyright

[David Janes]

Of course. I retract my last message. Orthogonal issues.

Regards, etc...

On 11/18/06, kota the vantguarde <vantguarde at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 11/18/06, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > I'm starting to look at using rel="license". Am I right in thing that it
> > can be used to indicate that a page is NOT available under a license, as
> > well as for those that are? For instance:
> >
> >        This page is <a rel="license"
> >        href="http://www.example.com/copyright>copyright Example Ltd.
> >        2006</a> and may not be reproduced.
>
> If it's not published under a certain licence but copyrighted (like in
> this case), you should use rel="copyright" instead of rel-licence.
>
> The value "copyright" is a predefined linktype in HTML,
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-links)
> and says that "Refers to a copyright statement for the current document."
> So I think using rel-copyright would perfectly fit in.
>
> --
> vant m. yak / vantguarde at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>


-- 
David Janes
Founder, BlogMatrix
http://www.blogmatrix.com
http://www.onamine.com
http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com