[uf-discuss] [citation] url field

[Bruce D'Arcus]

On 11/30/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote:

> I also suggest that in the case of identifiers like a DOI or ISBN
> which can be represented as a parameter in a link to doi.org or some
> other resolver, that the format encourage using a URL field for those
> identifiers and not include separate fields for each such identifier.
> In other words, I think that class="url uid"  is sufficient to encode
> DOI/ISBN/etc., and we shouldn't add a separate DOI class, a separate
> ISBN class, and so on.

What about non-http URIs?

Bruce