[uf-discuss] stats on well formed XHTML
burton at tailrank.com
Fri Jan 18 23:07:56 PST 2008
On Jan 18, 2008 12:06 AM, Kevin Marks <kevinmarks at gmail.com> wrote:
> What I found with the technorati crawler was that the atom timestamps
> were mroe reliabel than RSS, as RSS timezones were underspecified.
> Talking of hAtom, here's a tool that uses it:
I'm actually doing this right now. There's a lot of RSS and Atom that
uses incorrect date/time.
For example, the Six Apart update stream uses ISO 8601 atom:published
without a timezone.
I was able to figure out that they were using Z but only after inspection.
Won't someone PLEASE think of the robots! :)
Location: San Francisco, CA
Work: http://spinn3r.com and http://tailrank.com
Fax: 1-415-358-419 PIN: 0092
More information about the microformats-discuss