Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- [[Category:Drafts]]11 KB (1,587 words) - 16:28, 18 July 2020
- See the [[Main_Page#Specifications|list of specs and drafts]] for more recommended top level microformats. ===Q: ''How come microformats stay as drafts even though they seem usable?'' ===34 KB (5,453 words) - 05:18, 9 October 2023
- ...a very limited number of categories in order to present specifications and drafts differently than other wiki pages. For now if you think additional Categori16 KB (1,715 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
- ...nclusion as quite the opposite. Because rel="cite" *is* defined in XHTML2 drafts, and microformats allow you add rel values to HTML4/XHTML1 *now*, adopting14 KB (2,270 words) - 23:09, 14 January 2010
- ** Indeed any time we consider adopting anything from technologies in working drafts we should consider their stability and dependability on a case-by-case basi10 KB (1,570 words) - 23:41, 14 December 2020
- ...tf.org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] est un format XML pour publier des RFCs et des Drafts Internet, voir [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.ht14 KB (2,131 words) - 22:09, 20 December 2008
- ...We use a limited number of categories in order to group specifications and drafts (and the category assignments are used to render them differently than othe15 KB (2,272 words) - 00:45, 4 April 2013
- ...d on the [[Main_Page|wiki home page]] that is included in other proposals, drafts. and specs. ''Recommend for adding to the [[include-pattern-faq]].16 KB (2,466 words) - 04:09, 7 January 2009
- ...a very limited number of categories in order to present specifications and drafts differently than other wiki pages. For now if you think additional Categori15 KB (2,486 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
- ...a very limited number of categories in order to present specifications and drafts differently than other wiki pages. For now if you think additional Categori15 KB (2,374 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
- ===Q : ''Comment les microformats restent comme des drafts même s'ils semblent utilisables ?'' ===33 KB (5,303 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
- ...comme complètement à l'opposé. Parce que rel="cite" *est* défini dans les drafts XHTML2, et que les microformats vous permettent d'ajouter *désormais* des16 KB (2,659 words) - 08:07, 6 January 2009
- ....org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] is an XML format for authoring RFCs and Internet Drafts, see [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html example18 KB (2,672 words) - 16:26, 18 July 2020
- ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al23 KB (3,339 words) - 16:43, 3 April 2018
- ...efinition given in: http://www.cleverclevergirl.com/?p=10 : <blockquote><p>Drafts a message to send to potential sponsors, follows up leads from others for p21 KB (3,116 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
- ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al19 KB (2,808 words) - 16:22, 18 July 2020
- ...tone of microformats'''. ''Inventing new attributes, depending on unstable drafts of HTML5, using non-standard DOCTYPEs or XML extensions is not an applicabl27 KB (3,570 words) - 16:34, 18 July 2020
- ...n nombre très limité de catégories afin de présenter les spécifications et drafts différemment des autres pages wiki. A cette heure, si vous pensez que des15 KB (2,455 words) - 16:27, 18 July 2020
- ...are marked as 'experimental', meaning that they may be removed from future drafts or the final specification, depending on experience and feedback from imple36 KB (5,415 words) - 11:09, 22 September 2013
- ...tone of microformats'''. ''Inventing new attributes, depending on unstable drafts of HTML5, using non-standard DOCTYPEs or XML extensions is not an applicabl27 KB (3,793 words) - 16:34, 18 July 2020
- The right direction is "re-use" by new proposals/drafts. If you see anything in hReview that appears to overlap this new specifica44 KB (6,955 words) - 11:00, 14 January 2008
- ...trong>Do not</strong> add rel values from obsolete/superceded proposals or drafts, instead add them to the table in the "dropped" section. A few rel values have been developed as drafts as a result of going through most of the microformats [[process]], and are89 KB (12,799 words) - 23:54, 30 November 2022
- <!-- TODO, озн. прв. 4 ===Q: ''How come microformats sometimes to linger as Drafts even though they seem usable?'' ===32 KB (1,079 words) - 09:13, 9 February 2014
- ....org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] in an XML format for authoring RFCs and Internet Drafts, see [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html example34 KB (4,524 words) - 19:40, 11 January 2022
- ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al35 KB (5,273 words) - 15:32, 17 August 2021
- ....org/rfc/rfc2629 RFC2629] is an XML format for authoring RFCs and Internet Drafts, see [http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html example55 KB (8,434 words) - 15:02, 26 May 2014
- The right direction is "re-use" by new proposals/drafts. If you see anything in hReview that appears to overlap this new specifica64 KB (10,413 words) - 23:22, 1 May 2007
- ...fine root class names and property names for all existing microformats and drafts consistent with this naming convention, and require support thereof from al71 KB (10,282 words) - 16:30, 18 July 2020
- ...rimez-vous SVP sur [[rel-profile]], [[html5-profile]] ou contribuez sur un drafts [[html5-vocab]].75 KB (11,559 words) - 16:29, 18 July 2020
- ...-uris|profile URLs]] for all established microformats and perhaps for some drafts as well74 KB (10,709 words) - 18:56, 20 November 2022