[uf-discuss] Unambiguous class names

David Janes davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Sat Dec 9 07:10:54 PST 2006

On 12/9/06, Brian Suda <brian.suda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/9/06, David Janes <davidjanes at blogmatrix.com> wrote:
> --- no, this is probably a very old example.
> > 2. Are not class names supposed to have a single meaning across _all_
> > microformats? I remember this from hAtom discussions, but ...
> --- yes, that is why much of what was in that example is incorrect
> > 3. Is this documented somewhere or is it something that everyone is
> > supposed to know (or am I just wrong)?
> --- is what documented? the fact that property values are the same
> across all microformats? or the values for the citation format?

The latter. I though that "but" and ellipses from point 2 leading into
point 3 made this clear.

> > 4. If my assumption is correct, should I note it in a few pages;
> --- i'm not sure what your assumption is? the citation format is still
> being mashed out - so the property values should not be taken as
> final.

As per the previous point regarding property values across all microformats.

Regards, etc...

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list