scott at randomchaos.com
Sun Dec 31 09:29:24 PST 2006
On Dec 30, 2006, at 4:04 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> Scott Reynen wrote:
>> "More valuable" is all relative to likelihood to be
>> published. I believe rel="nsfw" was suggested on this list a
>> while back, and this same vagueness issue was raised at the
>> time. But I think in practice, almost no one is publishing
>> ratings with links, and many people are publishing "NSFW"
> Can you please provide some examples of real world publishing
I would be happy to, except ... On Dec 29, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Frances
> The content-rating got listed under rejected-formats instead .
I don't have any real world examples that couldn't work with the rel-
tag suggestion in that rejection.
More information about the microformats-discuss