mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Sun Dec 31 10:39:52 PST 2006
Scott Reynen wrote:
> > Scott Reynen wrote:
> >> "More valuable" is all relative to likelihood to be published. I
> >> believe rel="nsfw" was suggested on this list a while
> back, and this
> >> same vagueness issue was raised at the time. But I think in
> >> practice, almost no one is publishing ratings with links, and many
> >> people are publishing "NSFW"
> >> warnings.
> > Can you please provide some examples of real world publishing
> > behavior?
> I would be happy to, except ... On Dec 29, 2006, at 9:21 AM,
> Frances Berriman wrote:
> > The content-rating got listed under rejected-formats instead .
> > http://microformats.org/wiki/rejected-formats#Content_Rating
> I don't have any real world examples that couldn't work with
> the rel- tag suggestion in that rejection.
FWIW, that rel-tag suggestion was unclear to me. But my question was just
to make sure you provided real world examples as it appeared you were
advocating for a "nsfw" tag with providing examples.
More information about the microformats-discuss