[uf-discuss] hAtom permalink
David Janes -- BlogMatrix
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Mon Feb 6 11:45:03 PST 2006
OK, I agree.
Ryan King wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Ryan King wrote:
>> On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:11 PM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
>>> Ryan King wrote:
>>>> 2. "Entry Permalinks MUST be the same as the atom:link (or rss:link)
>>>> used in syndication feeds"
>>>> This is out-of-scope for a microformat. I suggest we eliminate it.
>>> SHOULD? Most hAtom producers will be Atom producers -- it would be
>>> nice if this lined up.
>> IMO, this doesn't belong in the hAtom spec. Sure, it'd be nice if
>> these things lined up, but that has nothing to do with hAtom itself -
>> its completely orthogonal.
> Alright, accidentally hit send to early again (I hit Cmd-shift-D instead
> of Cmd-Cntl-D)...
> The point I'm trying to make here is that such clauses don't help us
> any- they're essentially bloat on the spec, because they can't be
> enforced, it doesn't gain us much if they are enforced and it makes the
> format more complex.
More information about the microformats-discuss