[uf-discuss] hReview and the structured blogging tools

Phillip Pearson pp at myelin.co.nz
Thu Jan 12 13:21:30 PST 2006

>>should becomes something like:
>><a href="http://example.com/tags/Food">
>><b>Food rating</b>:
>><span class="rating">4</span> out of <span class="best">5</span></a>
>><br />
>Better, but still needs fixing:
> * for better semantic XHTML (to fix <b> & <br> abuse)
> * it is missing rel="tag", and
> * "best" is unnecessary since 5 is the default best.
><a style="display:block" href="http://example.com/tags/Food" rel="tag">
><h4 style="display:inline">Food rating</h4>:
><span class="rating">4</span> out of 5
>Note that I inlined the necessary CSS style properties to achieve the
>presentation that was previously achieved with the presentational tags <b> &
><br>.  Ideally that styling would be done via a style sheet.

<a class="sb-rating" href="http://structuredblogging.org/ratings/food" 
<h4 class="sb-rating-title">Food rating</h4>:
<span class="rating">4</span> out of 5</a>

... possibly with a <div> around the outside, or whatever's required to 
make Wordpress's content filters not mangle it.

Then we can put something up at /ratings/food that links to relevant tag 
pages - technorati, del.icio.us, etc - and explains what the SB plugin 
means by food rating.

>>Visually, all sub-ratings will be a hyperlink.
>This is so that the user can click on them and see what the reviewer *means*
>by "Food".  That example.com/tags/Food page could for example explain
>precisely what 1,2,3,4,5 means in terms of a Food rating.

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list