[uf-discuss] Microformat for linking to XML source (to replace
the Structured Blogging plugin's embedding method)
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
supercanadian at gmail.com
Wed Jan 18 17:12:52 PST 2006
On 1/18/06, Phillip Pearson <pp at myelin.co.nz> wrote:
> >>>> Anyone know of any prior art?
> >>> <link rel="alternate" type="application/xml" />
> >> Is that valid inside the HTML <body> block?
> > No, but <a rel="alternate" type="application/xml">foo</a> is.
> > RTFS: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#type-links.
> Excellent - thanks Mark and Ryan! I didn't realise that the "type"
> attribute was valid on <a> elements.
> Does that require that we serve the XML with the application/xml MIME
> type? The spec calls the type attribute an "advisory hint"; I'm not
> sure whether this means it has to be correct, or only that it has to be
> close enough (e.g. to text/xml or application/something+xml) to let a
> reader know that the linked resource is XML.
Wasn't "text/xml" deprecated?! And instead you are suppose to use
"application/xml" or "application/???+xml", etc. (If I remember
correctly, this was done because of text-transcoders and conflicts
between "text types" specified with HTTP and XML. I think I read this
on Mark Pilgrim's blog... but I couldn't find the article.)
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
Never forget where you came from
More information about the microformats-discuss