[uf-discuss] hReview aggregate ratings (was Re: hReview feedback)
jpanzer at aol.net
Wed Jan 18 23:47:32 PST 2006
Ryan King wrote:
> .... Its those individual votes which are candidates for hreview, not
> the aggregate data.
Going off on a tangent from this point: Why not?
I can identify some use cases where aggregate ratings data is published
on web pages
http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/poll?view=69043&pollId=69096 just to pick
two completely at random). What microformat should I use to make this
data more easily accessible?
Seems to me that hReview is an appropriate starting point -- though it
would certainly need fractional values and also some way to indicate
weighting (something like "Based on <span class="weight">131</span>
Of course it's late and perhaps this is obviously nuts in some way.
Please let me know.
Sr Technical Manager, AOL
More information about the microformats-discuss