[uf-discuss] Unclear status of 'include-pattern'

[Andy Mabbett]

In message
<cdc278e10610190203o3d59124du8142e6b45da5cc1b at mail.gmail.com>, Ciaran
McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> writes

>Andy Mabbett wrote:
>> >> As I noted on the Wiki a few hours ago, it's not clear, either from the
>> >> main Wiki page or include-pattern, whether the latter is an agreed
>> >> standard, a draft, or just a proposal.
>> >
>> >It is currently listed in the "Design Patterns" section on the wiki
>> >home page.
>>
>> And as such, it's not  clear whether it is an agreed standard, a draft,
>> or just a proposal.
>
>It's none of the three things you mention

How can a DP not be specified? How can it never exist in draft status?
How can it not have been, at some point, a more proposal?

Can no further DPs be proposed, or exist in draft status? Can no more be
specified?
-- 
Andy Mabbett
                Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>

                Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>