[uf-discuss] Unclear status of 'include-pattern'

[David Janes]

The initial design-patterns ... and I know because I wrote them ...
were distillations of existing practices. Include breaks this pattern
only slightly, but was a reasonable isolation of a unit of work from
hResume (I believe)

Regards, etc...
David

On 10/19/06, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> In message
> <cdc278e10610190203o3d59124du8142e6b45da5cc1b at mail.gmail.com>, Ciaran
> McNulty <mail at ciaranmcnulty.com> writes
>
> >Andy Mabbett wrote:
> >> >> As I noted on the Wiki a few hours ago, it's not clear, either from the
> >> >> main Wiki page or include-pattern, whether the latter is an agreed
> >> >> standard, a draft, or just a proposal.
> >> >
> >> >It is currently listed in the "Design Patterns" section on the wiki
> >> >home page.
> >>
> >> And as such, it's not  clear whether it is an agreed standard, a draft,
> >> or just a proposal.
> >
> >It's none of the three things you mention
>
> How can a DP not be specified? How can it never exist in draft status?
> How can it not have been, at some point, a more proposal?
>
> Can no further DPs be proposed, or exist in draft status? Can no more be
> specified?
> --
> Andy Mabbett
>                 Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
>
>                 Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>