[uf-discuss] 'currency' microformat straw-man proposal.
scott at randomchaos.com
Wed Sep 20 14:49:48 PDT 2006
On Sep 20, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>> <abbr class="currency" title="USD">
>> <span class="amount">42.67</span>
>> Isn't this suggesting that "42.67" is an abbreviation for "USD"?
> I've commented before that microformats already "misuse" <abbr> in
Where is that? I don't remember seeing anything like this, where one
piece of information is declared as abbreviation for another and
they're not even the same kind of information.
>> More generally, if the currency isn't published anywhere, doesn't
>> make it out of scope for microformats?
> The example, which you've only partially quoted, is a table row;
> elsewhere in that Wiki entry, I've talked of such rows having header
> cells; again, the wider issue is something I've addressed elsewhere.
Okay, it wasn't clear to me that the examples were part of a larger
document with relevant data elsewhere. That's probably another
argument for using explicit inclusion:
> How would you solve these two issues?
When the data is on the page, this seems like an ideal use of the
Specifically, something like this:
<th><abbr title="USD" id="usd" class="currency">Cost</abbr></th>
<a class="include" href="#usd"></a>
There's been some previous discussion of table columns specifically
here, but I'm not as clear on that:
When the data is not on the page at all, I'd say that's out of scope
More information about the microformats-discuss