[uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec "References"

Andy Mabbett andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Wed Jan 3 15:35:10 PST 2007

In message <KyBIFw59oDnFFwkX at pigsonthewing.org.uk>, Andy Mabbett
<andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> writes

> two informative references:
>so I have now removed them:

Apologies; the correct edit was:


Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that.

So, it seems that it *is* OK for me to add 'previously non-referenced in
the spec "References"', *except* when Tantek orders me not to add
'previously non-referenced in the spec "References"'.

I confess, I'm confused.

Can anyone tell me how I'm supposed to keno when I can, and when I
cannot add such informative references? Or are the rules just created
and ignored according to whim?

Andy Mabbett
            *  Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards:  <http://www.no2id.net/>
            *  Free Our Data:  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
            *  Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list