[uf-discuss] previously non-referenced in the spec
Tantek Ç elik
tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Wed Jan 3 16:01:09 PST 2007
On 1/3/07 3:35 PM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> In message <KyBIFw59oDnFFwkX at pigsonthewing.org.uk>, Andy Mabbett
> <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> writes
>> two informative references:
>> so I have now removed them:
> Apologies; the correct edit was:
> Though, bizarrely, Tantek has reverted that.
Please refrain from making ad-hominem attacks on the mailing list.
> So, it seems that it *is* OK for me to add 'previously non-referenced in
> the spec "References"',
The E.123 reference was informative reference that provided a nice
informative summary of a normative reference was only available by paid
document, thus was not previously non-referenced. In addition, to make it
even more clear I added a section that noted that authors MAY wish to use
E.123 formatting for their telephone numbers.
> *except* when Tantek orders me not to add
> 'previously non-referenced in the spec "References"'.
No, the coordinates references was both previously non-referenced, and not
particularly relevant. I made an editor judgment call to remove a seemingly
not-very-related link and removed it. That is sufficient reason.
Finally, note that this is yet another meta-discussion email that you have
sent, and thus as promised, absent any objections from anyone else on the
list (or IRC), you will shortly be banned from the mailing-list for a week.
I am sorry to do this, but your continued inability to listen to the
requests that have been made, and your continued flood of meta-discussion
emails on the list have left me no other choice in order to maintain the
quality of discussion on this list.
More information about the microformats-discuss